In a move aimed at tackling anti-Semitism, former US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that marks a significant shift in policy. This order primarily affects foreign students and individuals participating in pro-Palestinian protests, potentially leading to their deportation ¹.
The Trump administration has taken a firm stance against what it perceives as a surge in anti-Semitic activities across the country. The new order focuses on prosecuting threats to American Jewish communities, including terrorism, arson, vandalism, and violence. This policy gained significance following the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Trump made it clear that foreign residents participating in “pro-jihadist” protests would face deportation in 2025. Additionally, visas for students expressing pro-Hamas sentiments on university campuses would be swiftly revoked ².
The situation on US campuses has become increasingly tense, with protests under the “Free Palestine” banner leading to a rise in anti-Semitic, anti-Arab, and Islamophobic incidents. Tensions in the Middle East, particularly between Arab communities and Israel, have influenced these developments. Under this order, agency and department heads have been tasked with presenting recommendations for combating anti-Semitism within 60 days ¹.
Human rights organizations have raised concerns over this executive order, arguing that it impedes free speech and undermines Palestinian humanity while claiming to fight anti-Semitism. Critics have characterized the measure as dishonest, excessive, and unenforceable. Many protesters deny any association with Hamas, insisting that their protests were directed against Israeli military actions in Gaza ².
Trump has maintained a staunch stance against pro-Hamas supporters since his 2024 campaign. His administration’s strict immigration policies have reignited debates on freedom and security. The executive order compelling expulsion of protest participants represents a defined push through his broader policies on law and immigration ³.
This initiative is among many designed to address what Trump refers to as radicalism infesting campuses, focusing specifically on students associated with pro-Hamas activities. The order has sparked concerns about its implications for free speech, privacy rights, and institutional responsibilities. Ultimately, compliance decisions may vary by institution, influenced by their interpretations of the legal risks and political pressures involved.